Minko Nikolov Brecht's path to maturity
Free access
-
Summary/Abstract
SummaryThe innovators and seekers, the Argonauts of the march for new art, go against the tide. They teach their contemporaries the most difficult habit - to break traditional notions, to get used to the unknown and unusual. Ehrenburg congratulated the 80-year-old Picasso on his youth. The surest sign of an artist's youth are the disputes that flare up around his work. Innovation does not like the fanfare of unanimous recognition, it does not tolerate the incense of jubilee eulogies. Its ambition is different: to divide minds, to clash them and thus make new and unsuspected truths phosphoresce. Brecht is among the great phenomena of contemporary art, which are very contested and against which aesthetic inertia has long persisted. His value is affirmed through the resistance of canonical opinions and traditional tastes. Like other of his contemporaries such as Mayakovsky and Picasso, he caused aesthetic disturbances throughout his life due to his firm intention to renew the language of the centuries-old stage art, to satisfy the needs of a scientific age and a dialectical way of thinking. When Brecht's theater visited Moscow or Paris, it did not generate universal approval and recognition with its performances. The audience was far more unanimous and enthusiastic, applauding Vico Torriani's variety evenings or the numbers of the Viennese revue on ice. After Brecht, however, something else remained: the restlessness, the productive anxiety that the theater was being cleared of junk. The fools stirred, the routineists united. After Brecht, the debates began.Keywords: Пътят, Брехт, зрелостта