"Inspired Work". (On the problems of the dynamics of critical genres)

The most natural and therefore the most widespread idea of ​​criticism is that it should be distinguished from art by its scientific-logical, conceptual nature of thinking. But we often encounter a directly opposite definition, emphasizing the connection of criticism with artistic thinking, the peculiar way in which it recreates vital and literary problems. The artistry of criticism and its belonging to the vast and diverse field of art were spoken of primarily by authors who examined Belinsky. Leafing through the fiery pages of his works, they enthusiastically noted the poetic aspiration, the captivating lyricism and dramatic tension of his articles. "The point is," writes Al. Grigoriev, "that both art and criticism are subject to one criterion." And in this sense it is clear that he evaluates Belinsky's articles as works of art, which are distinguished by "extraordinary lyricism" and conquer with their brightness, passion and intoxication of the first feeling. The same delight in the artistic and poetic nature of Belinsky's articles, in the power of his words, was also felt by such contemporaries as Goncharov, Turgenev, Dostoevsky and many others.